Instructions for Authors

We welcome high-quality original research articles and survey papers in all areas of mathematics, applied mathematics, and computer science. Before submitting a manuscript, authors are encouraged to read these guidelines carefully to ensure a smooth submission and review process.

Manuscript Submission

Manuscript Format

Manuscripts must be prepared using LaTeX, in accordance with the official template provided here: RJM_CS_Sample_tex. Authors must submit the generated .pdf file. After acceptance, both the .tex source file and the generated .pdf file must be submitted. For reference, please consult the sample manuscript available here: RJM_CS_Sample_pdf.

Each manuscript should include the following elements:

Use predefined environments for theorem-like statements, such as \begin{theorem} … \end{theorem}, and the standard \begin{proof} … \end{proof} environment for proofs.
Make sure that all numbering for theorems, sections, figures, and tables referenced later in the paper is generated using the standard LaTeX commands \label{…} and \ref{…}.
Figures must be high-resolution and accompanied by descriptive captions. Captions should be provided separately from the figures, not embedded within them.
Tables should be included as editable text (not as images) and must also have descriptive captions.
References must be written in the journal’s format (see RJM_CS_Sample_pdf) and alphabetically ordered (with respect to the first author’s name). All references in the bibliography must be cited in the text, and all in-text citations must appear in the reference list.

Ethical Responsibilities
By submitting a manuscript to RJM-CS, authors confirm that:

All manuscripts are screened for plagiarism and ethical compliance. It is the authors’ responsibility to ensure that their manuscript complies with the highest ethical standards prior to submission.
Proper citation and attribution must be provided for all sources that have influenced the work. Confidential information obtained during peer review or grant evaluation must be respected and not disclosed or reused.
Authors should be prepared to revise the manuscript based on reviewers’ feedback and respond to editorial requests professionally.
Personal attacks in academic discourse are unacceptable. Constructive critique of published work is encouraged but must remain professional.